Non-autoregressive seq2seq models produce outputs in parallel rather than one word at a time.

The best definition for an autogressive model comes from the paper Gu 2017.

Definition: Autoregressive (Gu 2017) An autoregressive model generates tokens conditioned on the sequence of tokens previously generated. In other words, it operates one step at a time: it generates each token conditioned on the sequence of tokens previously generated.

Examples of autoregressive models (from Gu 2017) include RNNs, LSTMs, CNNs, and Transformers.

From Zhou & Keung 2020 - Improving Non-autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Monolingual Data:

Many non-autoregressive (NAR) translation methods have been proposed, including latent space models (Gu et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2019; Shu et al., 2019), iterative refinement methods (Lee et al., 2018; Ghazvininejad et al., 2019), and alternative loss functions (Libovicky and Helcl, 2018; Wang et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019; Shao et al., 2019). The decoding speedup for NAR models is typically 2-15× depending on the specific setup (e.g., the number of length candidates, number of latent samples, etc.), and NAR models can be tuned to achieve different trade-offs between time complexity and decoding quality (Gu et al., 2017; Wei et al., 2019; Ghazvininejad et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2019).

All these methods are based on transformer modules (Vaswani et al., 2017), and depend on a well-trained AR model to obtain its output translations to create targets for NAR model training.

• Gu et al 2017 - Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation
• Ghazvininejad et al 2019 - Mask-Predict: Parallel Decoding of Conditional Masked Language Models
• Lee et al 2020 - On the Discrepancy between Density Estimation and Sequence Generation
• Zhou & Keung 2020 - Improving Non-autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Monolingual Data
• Gu & Kong 2020 - Fully Non-autoregressive Neural Machine Translation:Tricks of the Trade Extensive experiments pushing the boundary of non-autoregressive methods toward auto-regressive performance. Introduces CTC loss
• Kasai et al 2020 - Deep Encoder, Shallow Decoder: Reevaluating the Speed-Quality Tradeoff in Machine Translation
• Liu et al 2021 - Enriching Non-Autoregressive Transformer with Syntactic and Semantic Structures for Neural Machine Translation (not very good, not published. Changmao plans to redo this with AMR structures as input)
• Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation with Latent Alignments From Google, uses CTC loss from Gu & Kong 2020
• Kasai et al 2020 - Deep Encoder, Shallow Decoder: Reevaluating Non-autoregressive Machine Translation